(Created page with 'There are strong reasons for helping people to manage their reproduction, in terms of reducing poverty. Spending the same resources to take care of a smaller number of children h…')
 
(merge proposal)
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
There are strong reasons for helping people to manage their reproduction, in terms of reducing poverty. Spending the same resources to take care of a smaller number of children helps to ensure better outcomes for those children.
{{merge to|Population management}}


However, there is a popular myth that population growth is a cause of our environmental problems. In fact, the impact of the wealthy, though very few in number, is far greater than the impact of the poor, even in areas where population is large and/or rapidly growing.  
[[File:Fertility rate world map 2.png|thumb|right|250px|Global fertility rates]]
The '''population growth''' is the speed in which a population increases.


An effective way for a population to reduce its population growth is to become wealthier. Wealthier, more educated people have more choices, and on the whole choose to have less children. (If we analyze more carefully, is the association more close with health and other indicators of human welfare, or with actual wealth?)  
==Effect of population growth==
===In regards to climate change===
{{Main|Developing countries}}
There is a popular myth that population growth alone determines our impact on the environment. In reality though, it is the combination of both the population size, as the (degree of) [[Consumerism|participation of each member on the economy]], as the way in which each member chooses to use this wealth<ref>Ie someone with millions of $ on his bank account can decide to park it there untill he dies</ref><ref>Ie someone with a limited budget can still have a major negative impact on the environment, ie by starting a forest fire, and/or can also have other negative impacts (ie by disposing all his organically non-decomposable waste in the environment (littering), ...</ref> that determines this.


Amartya Sen compares population control measures in Kerala (based on education and free choice) with China (often forced) and finds that Kerala's were actually slightly more effective. This is discussed in his book ''Development as Freedom''.
==See also==
* [[Population size]]
 
==Notes and references==
{{reflist}}


== External links  ==
== External links  ==
* [http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14744915&source=hptextfeature Falling fertility], ''The Economist'', Oct 29th 2009. Argues that there is little more to be achieved in developed countries through population policy, as growth is already falling about as fast as can be expected. Thus emissions reductions in these countries must come through technology and governance.


*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2009/sep/28/population-growth-super-rich Stop blaming the poor. It's the wally yachters who are burning the planet], George Monbiot, guardian.co.uk, 28 September 2009.
{{attrib|url=http://www.urbansprout.co.za/population_growth_has_no_relation_to_global_warming|author=Ahmed|license=CC-BY-SA}}


[[Category:Ecological footprint]]  
[[Category:Ecological footprint]]  
[[Category:Growth]]  
[[Category:Growth]]  
[[Category:Population]]
[[Category:Population]]
[[Category:Population and sustainability]]

Revision as of 20:08, 18 August 2015

Global fertility rates

The population growth is the speed in which a population increases.

Effect of population growth

In regards to climate change

There is a popular myth that population growth alone determines our impact on the environment. In reality though, it is the combination of both the population size, as the (degree of) participation of each member on the economy, as the way in which each member chooses to use this wealth[1][2] that determines this.

See also

Notes and references

Template:Reflist

External links

  • Falling fertility, The Economist, Oct 29th 2009. Argues that there is little more to be achieved in developed countries through population policy, as growth is already falling about as fast as can be expected. Thus emissions reductions in these countries must come through technology and governance.

Template:Attrib

  1. Ie someone with millions of $ on his bank account can decide to park it there untill he dies
  2. Ie someone with a limited budget can still have a major negative impact on the environment, ie by starting a forest fire, and/or can also have other negative impacts (ie by disposing all his organically non-decomposable waste in the environment (littering), ...
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.