(Nominations for good pages) |
(→Nominations for good pages: reasons) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Nominations for good pages == | == Nominations for good pages == | ||
Please add to the list: | Please add to the list. This helps us choose pages to package for [[Appropedia's OLPC content bundle]], and to use for promoting Appropedia content: | ||
* The [[Arcata Marsh]] pages are excellent. I think the professor may have noted somewhere which pages met his standards, and these would definitely qualify. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 15:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | * The [[Arcata Marsh]] pages are excellent. I think the professor may have noted somewhere which pages met his standards, and these would definitely qualify. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 15:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:11, 19 October 2009
Nominations for good pages
Please add to the list. This helps us choose pages to package for Appropedia's OLPC content bundle, and to use for promoting Appropedia content:
- The Arcata Marsh pages are excellent. I think the professor may have noted somewhere which pages met his standards, and these would definitely qualify. --Chriswaterguy 15:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)