Line 14: Line 14:
===Should [[:Category:Curricula]] be [[:Category:Curriculum]]?===
===Should [[:Category:Curricula]] be [[:Category:Curriculum]]?===
On the article page, we have a deadend category, which should be singular?
On the article page, we have a deadend category, which should be singular?
:Singular it should be.  It is changed.  Thank you. --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 07:53, 14 October 2006 (PDT)

Revision as of 14:53, 14 October 2006

"local resource finder" by region/country

Seems like "local resource finder" pages should also be categorized by country or other regional scheme. Comments? --Curtbeckmann 17:18, 11 October 2006 (PDT)

Yes - how fine the distinctions are will depend on how many pages are in the category. I'd think that country will do us for the forseeable future, and we can go for states or whatever if we have many pages later. --Singkong2005 · talk 21:25, 11 October 2006 (PDT)
Yep, totally agree. In fact, I think that many of our our other pages will also be listed by region. I will try to put some general comment about that on the Appropedia:Community portal. I am okay with any type of regional categoraization. As Singkong suggests, we should watch for categories getting too large, and then we can break those categories down into smaller subcategories. Two additional suggestions:
  1. Users are welcome to pick a smaller regional subcategory.
    • This is especially true for those regional subcategories that have high probable activity, e.g. Category:Humboldt County.
  2. Pages are only categorized under one regional category, i.e. not Category:Humboldt County and Category:USA, just one. (BTW eventually we will probably have states in between the small regional and the country categories).
Does that sound right? --Lonny 23:50, 11 October 2006 (PDT)
Sounds perfect! Thanks. --Curtbeckmann 07:04, 12 October 2006 (PDT)
Agreed - very good. --Singkong2005 · talk 18:49, 12 October 2006 (PDT)

Should Category:Curricula be Category:Curriculum?

On the article page, we have a deadend category, which should be singular?

Singular it should be. It is changed. Thank you. --Lonny 07:53, 14 October 2006 (PDT)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.